![]() The film gets most of the little stuff right, oddly enough would it had lavished the same care on the big stuff.القصة / محتال سابق يضع منصبًا في مدرسة تقع على الفور حيث تم إخفاء الأموال من إحدى عمليات السطو السابقة fack ju göhte 3 or suck me shakespeer 3 is a german film from, still relatively new, and as the title gives away the third installment of its franchise. On the plus side, the supporting cast, sets, and costumes are excellent. I hope we don't get a sequel called "Shakespeare in a Jealous Rage" that shows him killing his wife so he can write Othello. Leaving aside the ample evidence that the playwright may have been the least blocked writer who ever lived, he always used other texts as the basis for his plays. Then there's the idea that Shakespeare was blocked and needed experience to write from. I normally like Paltrow, but this film lowered my opinion of her acting chops. But Gwyneth Paltrow in a tiny fake moustache is about as masculine as a troupe of ballerinas at a quilting bee, so believing that everyone was fooled requires some serious IQ-shaving. ![]() I'm not saying it wasn't possible for a woman to cross-dress in early modern England it happened. As for the love story and its theatrical issue, both were the height of silliness. I almost walked out when John Webster, who would soon be writing complex, intellectual plays, was depicted as a child torturing rats and informing on Shakespeare's company, but that was just one of many instances. Knowing a lot about Renaissance drama just makes the film galling, as real historical figures are wrenched from their actual lives and made to serve a contrived and fantastical plot. I disagree with those who say knowing Shakespeare adds to a viewer's enjoyment, unless what is known is a play or two and some half-remembered facts about Elizabethan London. ![]() I disagree with those who say knowing Shakespeare adds to a viewer's enjoyment, unless what is known is a play or two and some half-remembered facts I'm not usually one to fault a film for historical inaccuracy, but this one went too far-and then failed to compensate with a decent story. I'm not usually one to fault a film for historical inaccuracy, but this one went too far-and then failed to compensate with a decent story. I am 17, and I do hope I am not the only person who doesn't think this movie is overrated- I thought it was a brilliant film, that wholly deserved the accolades it received. Her end monologue was beautifully written and Dench's interpretation was flawless. Simon Callow, Martin Clunes and Ben Affleck are solid in their roles, not to mention the wonderful performance of Judi Dench as Queen Elizabeth I. Geoffrey Rush, who actually looks like the Barbossa character he created in the Pirates of the Caribbean films, was hilarious, and Colin Firth makes Lord Wessex intentionally insufferable. And what a talented cast, with Joseph Fiennes utterly charming and handsome as William Shakespeare, and Gwyneth Paltrow in possibly her best performance was by every means captivating as Lady Viola. The direction from John Madden was spot on, and I believe it is the same John Madden who directed some of the greatest Inspector Morse episodes, and Inspector Morse in my opinion is the best British detective drama out there. The screenplay was superlative, very witty and moving, and one of the few screenplays out there that completely blew me away. You cannot go wrong with the splendid locations and the wondrous costumes. The direction from John Madden Shakespeare in Love was a fantastic film in all departments. Shakespeare in Love was a fantastic film in all departments.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |